3 thoughts on “Results of Rumble in the Jungle 2”

    1. No it certainly isn't. The purpose of the debate was to highlight the potential central role of B cells in MS, arguing against the entrenched dogma that T cells are the central players, which has held sway for 30 years or so. The mere fact that B cells are now being taken seriously by experts in the field after being ignored for so long, in part due to debates like this can only be a good thing.

    2. Yeah it's not a game… for pwMS, which makes the pharma funded posters presented with such fanfare, by laissez faire scientists, all the more damaging.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: