#MSCOVID19: adenoviral vector vaccines

Barts-MS rose-tinted-odometer: ★

You may have heard that the FDA has suspended dosing of the J&J COVID-19 vaccine as they have identified 6 cases of thrombosis in young woman similar to that described below with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (see articles below).  It looks like the complication may therefore be due to the vectors, i.e. adenoviruses, rather than the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. If this is the case there is likely to be similar cases identified with the Russian Sputnik V vaccine, which uses two different adenoviral vectors. 

Please remember that this thrombotic complication is still very rare, i.e. likely to be less than 1 person affected in over 100,000 vaccinated people, which is why the EMA, MHRA and WHO have made it clear that the potential benefit of the Ox-AX vaccine outweighs the risk of thrombosis. In other words, the risk of getting COVID-19 is far worse than the risks associated with the vaccine. So our message remains the same; #GetVaccinatedASAP.

Thrombotic (blood clots) thrombocytopaenia (low platelets) is an immune-mediated condition, in which your own immune system makes antibodies against a protein called platelet factor 4 expressed on platelets. In other words, it is an antibody-mediated autoimmune disease. This will allow haematologists and vaccinologists to study the condition and work out why it is happening and then manage the risk or hopefully prevent it from happening in the future. For example, it could simply be due to molecular mimicry to a protein or stretch of protein in one of the adenoviral proteins that could be engineered out of the next generation of vaccines. 

With my preventive medicine hat on I am concerned that this rare complication of the adenoviral vaccines will feed the anti-VAXX lobby and turn people off having the COVID-19 vaccine. This would be a great tragedy as it is the adenoviral vaccines that are going to save the world from this pandemic; they are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture and don’t have to be stored at -20 or -80. All these attributes make them the vaccines of choice for low and middle-income countries. 

Please note I would not have a problem being vaccinated with a COVID-19 adenoviral vaccine nor would I have a problem recommending these vaccines to my family members. 

Greinacher et al. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104840. Online ahead of print.

Background: Several cases of unusual thrombotic events and thrombocytopenia have developed after vaccination with the recombinant adenoviral vector encoding the spike protein antigen of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (ChAdOx1 nCov-19, AstraZeneca). More data were needed on the pathogenesis of this unusual clotting disorder.

Methods: We assessed the clinical and laboratory features of 11 patients in Germany and Austria in whom thrombosis or thrombocytopenia had developed after vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov-19. We used a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin antibodies and a modified (PF4-enhanced) platelet-activation test to detect platelet-activating antibodies under various reaction conditions. Included in this testing were samples from patients who had blood samples referred for investigation of vaccine-associated thrombotic events, with 28 testing positive on a screening PF4-heparin immunoassay.

Results: Of the 11 original patients, 9 were women, with a median age of 36 years (range, 22 to 49). Beginning 5 to 16 days after vaccination, the patients presented with one or more thrombotic events, with the exception of 1 patient, who presented with fatal intracranial hemorrhage. Of the patients with one or more thrombotic events, 9 had cerebral venous thrombosis, 3 had splanchnic-vein thrombosis, 3 had pulmonary embolism, and 4 had other thromboses; of these patients, 6 died. Five patients had disseminated intravascular coagulation. None of the patients had received heparin before symptom onset. All 28 patients who tested positive for antibodies against PF4-heparin tested positive on the platelet-activation assay in the presence of PF4 independent of heparin. Platelet activation was inhibited by high levels of heparin, Fc receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody, and immune globulin (10 mg per milliliter). Additional studies with PF4 or PF4-heparin affinity-purified antibodies in 2 patients confirmed PF4-dependent platelet activation.

Conclusions: Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 can result in the rare development of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia mediated by platelet-activating antibodies against PF4, which clinically mimics autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. (Funded by the German Research Foundation.).

Schultz et al. Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104882. Online ahead of print.

We report findings in five patients who presented with venous thrombosis and thrombocytopenia 7 to 10 days after receiving the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 adenoviral vector vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). The patients were health care workers who were 32 to 54 years of age. All the patients had high levels of antibodies to platelet factor 4-polyanion complexes; however, they had had no previous exposure to heparin. Because the five cases occurred in a population of more than 130,000 vaccinated persons, we propose that they represent a rare vaccine-related variant of spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia that we refer to as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

Conflicts of Interest

Preventive Neurology

Twitter

LinkedIn

Medium

Disclaimer: Please note that the opinions expressed here are those of Professor Giovannoni and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry nor Barts Health NHS Trust.

#MSCOVID19 – AstraZenca Vaccine Update

Barts-MS rose-tinted-odometer: ★★

In response to a comment from one of our readers. We have not directly addressed the thrombosis AstraZeneca vaccine issue as we are not vaccinologists or haematologists. But as there seems to a lot of anxiety around this issue a short blog post about the potential risks may allay your fears.

I received the following email, from Professor Marcel Levy (Consultant Haematologist and CEO, UCLH), on the 19th of March that suggests the underlying thrombotic disorder that has been recognised in patients who have received the Oxford-AstraZenca COVID-19 vaccine may be quite specific and identifiable. 

19th March

Dear Colleagues

I am taking a rather peculiar step but I think it is important to get this premature information out in the open for the potential benefit of patients.

We have found a strong clue about what is causing the rare thrombosis and thrombocytopenia in patients who received the COVID-19 vaccination. We have to be extremely careful because it is pending some more confirmation but there may be immediate implications for patients we cannot ignore. I know some others may be thinking in the same direction but are awaiting to publish the findings in a journal but we feel it takes too long and I think it is not responsible not sharing this with others as soon as possible.

We have identified three UK cases who developed rare (cerebral sinus vein) thrombosis in London after COVID-19  vaccination and Marie Scully of UCLH has identified a very strong anti-platelet factor 4 antibody response in those patients. They were not exposed to heparin before but you may realise Ted Warkentin has described incidental cases a few years ago (Warkentin TE, Basciano PA, Knopman J, Bernstein RA. Spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome: 2 new cases and a proposal for defining this disorder. Blood. 2014 Jun 5;123(23):3651-4.). We feel it may be a good idea if others are confronted with these patients to do a HIT-ELISA and to withhold heparin until we know whether this is real or a false lead and awaiting further confirmation.

Just want to emphasise that we all realise this is extremely rare and should not be a reason to stop vaccination whatsoever. However, when confronted with a case, this may have consequences for their optimal treatment.

Please feel free to share this information within your communities as you may seem fit, as it might have implications for patients (once again, I think we need to be very careful of course before jumping to conclusions).  I know we all want to be the first to publish, but we also have a responsibility for our patients.

All credits to Marie Scully who has done this test in these patients and is happy to share with everyone.

Best wishes, Marcel Levi
Prof. Marcel Levi MD PhD FRCP 
Professor of Medicine, University College London
Professor of Medicine, University of Amsterdam
Consultant in Acute & Vascular Medicine and Haematology 

Although we can’t be sure these thromboses are due to the AstraZenca vaccine it seems increasingly likely that they are as these sorts of thromboses have not been seen (yet) or described with the Pfizer-BionTech and other COVID-19 vaccines. According to the latest figures from the MHRA, there have been 22 reports of a blood clot or thrombosis in the brain called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) accompanied by a low platelet count (as described in the letter above) as well as eight reports of other blood clotting problems with low platelets, among recipients of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Of these 30 reported cases, seven people have died. The denominator is over 18 million people who have received the vaccine. At the moment the rate of this complication is 1.7 people per million vaccinated and one death for every 2.6M people vaccinated. These estimates are likely to be under-estimates because of a reporting lag, but even if the risk increase by a factor of 2 or 3 they will still be relatively low. This risk needs to be compared to 1 in 1000 chance of dying from COVID-19 if you are aged between 40 and 50 years of age.

You have to realise that when you are vaccinating the whole adult population shit is still happening in the background; i.e. people will be getting DVTs, pulmonary emboli, myocardial infarctions, pneumonia, Bell’s palsy, strokes, CVSTs, etc. Life and biology continue as normal and all that has changed is that a vaccine is added to the mix. So when the EMA and MHRA say the benefits of these vaccines, including the AstraZeneca vaccine, outway the risks they mean it and their advice is based on safety data from tens of millions of vaccinated adults and a risk:benefit analysis. The latter is a judgment call they make on the impact of COVID-19 at a population level vs. the population benefits of vaccination. Their message can’t be any clearer: #GetVaccinatedASAP and these #VaccinesAreSafe. I think these figures speak for themselves and I fear we are literally throwing the baby out with the bathwater by dismissing the AstraZeneca vaccine as being too risky to use in certain population groups.

If you have any doubts about the benefits of being vaccinated or not being vaccinated just look at what is happening in France and Germany at the moment compared to the UK. My question is how many extra deaths are going to have happened because of delayed vaccinations in these countries? I suspect orders of magnitude more people will die from COVID-19 than from the rare complications of the COVID-19 vaccines. Do you agree?

CoI: multiple

Twitter: @gavinGiovannoni                                              Medium: @gavin_24211

#MSCOVID19: coronavirus vaccine linked to MS-like complications

You will have heard by now that AstraZenca has paused its coronavirus vaccine study because of safety concerns. A study subject who received the vaccine developed transverse myelitis and had to be admitted to hospital. 

“The woman’s diagnosis has not been confirmed yet, but she is improving and will likely be discharged from the hospital as early as Wednesday”, said Soriot AstraZenca’s CEO (source STAT News).

From the same press conference, we also found out that another study subject had developed multiple sclerosis after receiving the vaccine. As most of you are aware transverse myelitis may be the initial manifestation of MS and sometimes it is very difficult to differentiate non-MS related transverse myelitis from CIS (clinically isolated syndrome compatible with demyelination or MS). 

Are two swallows enough to make a summer? I suspect not and I would be surprised if the data and safety monitoring committee recommends stopping the trials. However, they may do so if there is a third or fourth case. 

Transverse myelitis (TM)  is well described after vaccination as well as after viral and other infections. The yellow fever vaccine is probably the most common cause of vaccine associated TM. However, it was a common adverse event with the original rabies vaccine that was cultured and isolated from monkey neuronal cells. Fortunately, this is not how the rabies vaccine is made anymore and the incidence of TM is now much less common after rabies vaccination. Other vaccines that can trigger TM are influenzae, MMR, Japanese B encephalitis, hepatitis B and HPV vaccines. TM has also been associated with many infections, particularly viral and some bacterial infections. We neurologists refer to this type of TM as being vaccine-associated or post-infectious TM, respectively. 

Even if the AstraZenca vaccine trials restart, which in my opinion is likely, and the vaccine is shown to be effective, it is likely that the regulatory authorities will include TM as a potential adverse event. The latter will be based on the recent case and the historical perspective of other vaccines being known triggers of TM. What they will do about the case of MS is anyone’s guess, but I suspect they will include triggering MS disease activity as a potential adverse event as well. If they do this this will cause the MS community to probably err on the side of safety and hence this particular coronavirus vaccine will not be recommended for people with MS. 

Other implications is that there is a chance that the TM has not been induced by the Chimpanzee Adenovirus vector that is being used in this vaccine, but the actual coronavirus spike protein or immunogen. It is noteworthy that several cases of COVID-19 related TM have already been reported in the literature (see below), suggesting it may be the virus or the spike-protein that is the culprit.  If this proves to be the case then it is really bad news as TM will be a problem for the whole class of vaccines using the spike protein as the immunogen. 

So the implications of these observations are enormous for the field. However, there are things that can be done by neuroimmunologists to study the immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the Chimpanzee Adenovirus vector to see if there is any cross-reactivity with proteins and lipids in the spinal cord. The latter are standard molecular mimicry studies and this could help AstraZeneca and other vaccine manufacturers understand the TM risk in more detail.

You have to realise that this is what happens with vaccine and drug development and underscores why drug and vaccine development is so risky and expensive. The investment costs in terms of this vaccine have been largely derisked for AstraZenca by most of the preclinical development being funded and done by academia and the fact that the British and other governments have pre-ordered millions of doses of vaccine. 

We will update you on this story as it evolves. 

Addendum: the published case reports of TM-like conditions occurring in association with COVID-19.

1.Acute transverse myelitis after COVID-19 pneumonia.Munz M, Wessendorf S, Koretsis G, Tewald F, Baegi R, Krämer S, Geissler M, Reinhard M.J Neurol. 2020 Aug;267(8):2196-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09934-w. Epub 2020 May 26.PMID: 32458198 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
2.Transverse Myelitis in a Child With COVID-19.Kaur H, Mason JA, Bajracharya M, McGee J, Gunderson MD, Hart BL, Dehority W, Link N, Moore B, Phillips JP, Rogers D.Pediatr Neurol. 2020 Jul 29;112:5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.07.017. Online ahead of print.PMID: 32823138 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
3.Acute transverse myelitis in COVID-19 infection.Chow CCN, Magnussen J, Ip J, Su Y.BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Aug 11;13(8):e236720. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-236720.PMID: 32784242 Free PMC article.
4.COVID-19-associated acute transverse myelitis: a rare entity.Chakraborty U, Chandra A, Ray AK, Biswas P.BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Aug 25;13(8):e238668. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-238668.PMID: 32843475 Free PMC article.
5.Transverse myelitis related to COVID-19 infection.Zachariadis A, Tulbu A, Strambo D, Dumoulin A, Di Virgilio G.J Neurol. 2020 Jun 29:1-3. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09997-9. Online ahead of print.PMID: 32601756 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
6.COVID-19-associated acute necrotizing myelitis.Sotoca J, Rodríguez-Álvarez Y.Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Jun 10;7(5):e803. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000803. Print 2020 Sep.PMID: 32522767 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
7.Acute necrotizing myelitis and acute motor axonal neuropathy in a COVID-19 patient.Maideniuc C, Memon AB.J Neurol. 2020 Aug 9:1-3. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10145-6. Online ahead of print.PMID: 32772172 Free PMC article.
8.A case of possible atypical demyelinating event of the central nervous system following COVID-19.Zoghi A, Ramezani M, Roozbeh M, Darazam IA, Sahraian MA.Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Jun 24;44:102324. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102324. Online ahead of print.PMID: 32615528 Free PMC article.
9.Acute transverse myelitis associated with SARS-CoV-2: A Case-Report.Valiuddin H, Skwirsk B, Paz-Arabo P.Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020 May;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100091. Epub 2020 Jun 6.PMID: 32835294 Free PMC article.

CoI: multiple

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%