Are you a potential faller?

Barts-MS rose-tinted-odometer: ★★ (A Green & Yellow Friday – Lime Green (#32CC32) & Lemon Glacier (#F4FF00))

The biggest risk of losing your independence is falling and long bone fractures of the lower limbs. PwMS are 6x more likely than the general population to fall and fracture a lower limb long bone. I currently have a patient of mine with PPMS in hospital with bilateral fractures of the femur. She will not walk again. 

In our experience, the best predictor of falling is the need for a walking aid. The study below shows that fallers are more likely to have progressive or advanced MS and are already less mobile.

Please, please, please if you are tripping, having near falls or have fallen please get yourself referred to a falls prevention clinic and to see a physiotherapist. There are a lot of things that can be done to prevent falls.

Another issue is bone health. Faller or near fallers need to have their bone density checked and treated if low. The majority of pwMS have osteopenia and need to be on medication to manage this problem.  The reason why pwMS have thin bones is well known; less vitamin D, less sunlight, less physical activity, higher rate of smoking, intermittent steroids, etc. 

Prevention of falls and fractures is better than treating their consequences. I will do a separate MS-Selfie Newsletter on falls prevention.

Block et al. Identifying falls remotely in people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2021 Aug 17;1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10743-y.

Background: Falling is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) but tends to be under-ascertained and under-treated.

Objective: To evaluate fall risk in people with MS.

Methods: Ninety-four people with MS, able to walk > 2 min with or without an assistive device (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS ≤ 6.5) were recruited. Clinic-based measures were recorded at baseline and 1 year. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including a fall survey and the MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12), were completed at baseline, 1.5, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Average daily step counts (STEPS) were recorded using a wrist-worn accelerometer.

Results: 50/94 participants (53.2%) reported falling at least once. Only 56% of participants who reported a fall on research questionnaires had medical-record documented falls. Fallers had greater disability [median EDSS 5.5 (IQR 4.0-6.0) versus 2.5 (IQR 1.5-4.0), p < 0.001], were more likely to have progressive MS (p = 0.003), and took fewer STEPS (mean difference – 1,979, p = 0.007) than Non-Fallers. Stepwise regression revealed MSWS-12 as a major predictor of future falls.

Conclusions: Falling is common in people with MS, under-reported, and under-ascertained by neurologists in clinic. Multimodal fall screening in clinic and remotely may help improve patient care by identifying those at greatest risk, allowing for timely intervention and referral to specialized physical rehabilitation.

Conflicts of Interest

MS-Selfie Newsletter  /  MS-Selfie Microsite

Preventive Neurology

Twitter   /  LinkedIn  /  Medium

General Disclaimer: Please note that the opinions expressed here are those of Professor Giovannoni and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry nor Barts Health NHS Trust and are not meant to be interpreted as personal clinical advice.

Fallers

Barts-MS rose-tinted-odometer: ★

Mrs P came for her annual follow-up appointment. She has had MS for 12 years, was NEDA on dimethyl fumarate and had an EDSS of 4.0. She had fatiguable foot drop on the right; after walking for about 20 minutes her right leg would start dragging and her foot would catch on uneven surfaces. Does this symptom sound familiar?   

Fatiguable foot drop in MS is very common and indicates that the pyramidal nerve fibre tract or motor pathway, in Mrs P case to the right leg, has lost reserve and is vulnerable to slow degeneration of the sort that is associated with worsening MS or secondary progressive MS. 

Towards the end of the consultation, almost in passing, Mrs P told me that during the summer, whilst on holiday she had tripped and twisted her right ankle and had fractured her fibula (one of the long bones in the lower leg that helps support the ankle).  Fortunately, the fracture was mild and not unstable and she was managed with a soft foot splint. Although the fracture had healed her foot was still swollen and stiff. Interestingly, she had not been referred to physiotherapy for an exercise programme to advise her on a sensible rehabilitation programme. I said it was never too late to start rehabilitation.

As a reader of this blog, you must be aware that pwMS are at increased risk of falls and fractures, which is one of the most common causes of unscheduled or emergency hospital admissions for pwMS. A fractured neck of femur or femur is one of the reasons why pwMS end-up in a wheelchair and never mobilise again. 

In a Barts-MS audit Dr Ruh several years ago we showed that the best predictor of falls was the need or potential need for a walking aid, i.e. a foot splint, a foot-up, FES device (functional electric nerve stimulator), walking stick or sticks, walking frame etc. 

Another issue that is closely related to falls is bone health. PwMS are more likely to have thin bones (osteopaenia) and osteoporosis for multiple reasons, which also increases the risk of fractures, which is why we recommend bone density or DEXA scans in all of our patients at risk of falls. In addition, to a bone health screen, we try and get these vulnerable patients into a falls prevention clinic. The latter doesn’t always work as there is a shortage of physiotherapists in the NHS and the wait for falls clinics can be many months. 

We tried to address this problem by setting up a group falls prevention clinic a few years ago, but because of a lack of funding and a shortage of physiotherapy time within our NHS trust, we couldn’t make the clinic sustainable. This is a great pity as every year several patients under my care, such as Mrs P, fall and have fractures, which impacts on their quality of life and their MS. I often ask how many of these predictable fractures could have been prevented?

The study below shows that you can use technology, i.e. sensors to detect falls. A system like this could be embedded into a well-designed self-management or self-prevention application to tackle falls prevention and bone health at a population level. This is yet another example of technology showing great potential to improve preventive medicine, but as usual, there is no clear path on how to incorporate this type of innovation into routine clinical care. This is why my recent post on rethinking healthcare is so timely. As a MS HCP, I want an easy and well-oiled or frictionless system for testing these type of innovations in the NHS. Is that too much to ask for?

Do you use, or potentially need, a walking aid? Have you had any falls or near falls (trips)? If yes, you need to have the state of your bone health assessed and referred to a falls prevention clinic. Believe me when I say bone fractures are unpleasant; they are. I am typing this post supine with a painful fractured pelvis and a fractured cervical spine and a foggy head from the analgesics I am on to manage my pain. Although fractures heal they can leave behind residual deficits that could impact on your quality of life.

If any of you are having falls and have been on a falls prevention programme please feel free to share your experience. 

Mosquera-Lopez et al. Automated Detection of Real-World Falls: Modeled from People with Multiple Sclerosis. J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Nov 27;PP. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3041035.

Falls are a major health problem with one in three people over the age of 65 falling each year, oftentimes causing hip fractures, disability, reduced mobility, hospitalization and death. A major limitation in fall detection algorithm development is an absence of real-world falls data. Fall detection algorithms are typically trained on simulated fall data that contain a well-balanced number of examples of falls and activities of daily living. However, real-world falls occur infrequently, making them difficult to capture and causing severe data imbalance. People with multiple sclerosis (MS) fall frequently, and their risk of falling increases with disease progression. Because of their high fall incidence, people with MS provide an ideal model for studying falls. This paper describes the development of a context-aware fall detection system based on inertial sensors and time of flight sensors that is robust to imbalance, which is trained and evaluated on real-world falls in people with MS. The algorithm uses an auto-encoder that detects fall candidates using reconstruction error of accelerometer signals followed by a hyper-ensemble of balanced random forests trained using both acceleration and movement features. On a clinical dataset obtained from 25 people with MS monitored over eight weeks during free-living conditions, 54 falls were observed and our system achieved a sensitivity of 92.14%, and false-positive rate of 0.65 false alarms per day.

CoI: multiple

Twitter: @gavinGiovannoni 

Medium: @gavin_24211

#T4TD falls and fractures

Did you know that people with MS have a six times higher risk than age-matched controls of having a long bone fracture of the lower limb?

The reason for this is that pwMS often have balance problems, unsteadiness of gait (ataxia), lower limb weakness (dropped foot) and are maybe excessively sedated from their medications. All these factors increase your chances of falling. In addition, pwMS are at high risk of poor bone health (osteopaenia or osteoporosis) due to inactivity, reduced outdoor activity, low vitamin D levels, steroid treatment and comorbidities such as smoking. 

falls + poor bone health = increased long bone fractures

Why is this so important? A lower limb long bone fracture is one of the events that can tip someone with MS from being independent into becoming dependent and is often the trigger for needing a wheelchair. In addition, people with advanced MS don’t rehabilitate very well because they have reduced reserve and are usually quite disabled. 

How do you know if you are at risk of falls and fractures? We have shown that the best predictor of falls is the need for a walking aid (splint, stick, crutch, frame, functional electrical stimulator, etc.). If you are using a walking aid and are having falls, or near falls, you need to see a physiotherapist to be enrolled in a falls prevention programme and you will also need to have your bone density checked. This latter can be assessed via several methods, but the commonest is called a DEXA scan (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan). If you are found to be osteopaenic or osteoporotic you may need treatment. 

Falls and fracture prevention is another self-management task; please don’t ignore it!

Prevention is better than treating the consequences of falls and fractures. For example, one of my patients with MS tragically fell going to the toilet at night. She crashed into a mirror that shattered and lacerated her arm and severed her brachial artery. She tragically bled to death as she lived alone, did not have an alert dongle around her neck and was unable to get herself up off the floor. Ever since she died I have taken falls prevention very seriously. Can you please do the same? You never know it may even save your life. 

Long bones of the lower limbs = femur, tibia and fibula

#T4TD = Thought for the Day

CoI: none for this post

Foot drop

The study below tried to compare the clinical effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) and whether or not they were cost effective. The high drop-out rate (38%) made the study inconclusive.

When we, at Barts-MS, did a clinical audit a few years ago we showed that the best predictor of falls was the need to use a walking aid; e.g. walking stick, chair, AFO or FES. Falls in MSers are a major cause of morbidity and in fact mortality and are the 3rd or 4th most common reason why MSers need urgent, or unplanned, hospital admissions. Falls lead to head injuries and frequently cause fractures. For example, in the last 4 weeks, I have seen three patients who sustained fractures as a result of falls; one a fractured scaphoid bone in the wrist, another a fractured ankle and the third a fractured humerus and clavicle.

AFO

If you are tripping and/or falling please ask your neurologist or MS nurse to assess you to see if you need a physio assessment to reduce your risk of falls. Prevention is better than having to deal with the consequences of falls.

When it comes to ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) or functional electrical stimulation (FES) they both do the job equally well. Some people can’t tolerate AFOs (too bulky and unsightly) and others can’t tolerate FES devices (too finicky and/or painful). In addition, to these two options, there is a multitude of other options for MS-related foot drop that are available to you. If you don’t ask you won’t find out.

FES

If you are at risk of falls you need to look into your bone health. This requires a bone density or DEXA scan. MSers are at high risk of having thin bones (osteopaenia or osteoporosis) and may need medication to try and reverse this.

Renfrew et al. The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in Multiple Sclerosis: a multicentre randomized trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Apr 11:269215519842254. doi: 10.1177/0269215519842254.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) over 12 months in people with Multiple Sclerosis with foot drop.

DESIGN: Multicentre, powered, non-blinded, randomized trial.

SETTING: Seven Multiple Sclerosis outpatient centres across Scotland.

SUBJECTS: Eighty-five treatment-naïve people with Multiple Sclerosis with persistent (>three months) foot drop.

INTERVENTIONS: Participants randomized to receive a custom-made, AFO ( n = 43) or FES device ( n = 42).

OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessed at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months; 5-minute self-selected walk test (primary), Timed 25 Foot Walk, oxygen cost of walking, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Euroqol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, Activities-specific Balance and Confidence Scale, Psychological Impact of Assistive Devices Score, and equipment and National Health Service staff time costs of interventions.

RESULTS: Groups were similar for age (AFO, 51.4 (11.2); FES, 50.4(10.4) years) and baseline walking speed (AFO, 0.62 (0.21); FES 0.73 (0.27) m/s). In all, 38% dropped out by 12 months (AFO, n = 21; FES, n = 11). Both groups walked faster at 12 months with device ( P < 0.001; AFO, 0.73 (0.24); FES, 0.79 (0.24) m/s) but no difference between groups. Significantly higher Psychological Impact of Assistive Devices Scores were found for FES for Competence ( P = 0.016; AFO, 0.85(1.05); FES, 1.53(1.05)), Adaptability ( P = 0.001; AFO, 0.38(0.97); FES 1.53 (0.98)) and Self-Esteem ( P = 0.006; AFO, 0.45 (0.67); FES 1 (0.68)). Effects were comparable for other measures. FES may offer value for money alternative to usual care.

CONCLUSION: AFOs and FES have comparable effects on walking performance and patient-reported outcomes; however, high drop-outs introduces uncertainty.

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%