Epidemic

Barts-MS rose-tinted-odometer: ★

Do you live in Scotland? Thes latest MS incidence (new cases) and prevalence (all cases) figures from the Scottish Highlands should make Scottish public health officials shiver. 

In the Scottish Highlands, there are now over 18 people diagnosed with MS every year per 100,000 population with a total of 376 people with MS per 100,000 population. These figures may be artificially low as a lot of people born in the highlands may move away, for example to University or to work, and don’t get counted or included in these figures. 

This is one of the highest, if not the highest, MS incidence rates in the world and about 30% higher than the figure from about a decade ago. This would indicate that we are still living through an MS epidemic and something needs to be done about it as urgently as possible. 

What can be done? If MS is preventable the Scots should be setting-up and testing various MS prevention strategies to see if they can lower the incidence or at least stop its continual rise. This may be an opportune time to look into vitamin D prevention trials and campaigns to get first and second degree relatives to sign-up for more targeted MS prevention studies. 

Francisco Javier Carod-Artal. The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in the Scottish Highlands: Prevalence, incidence and time to confirmed diagnosis and treatment initiation. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Nov 28;47:102657.

Introduction: Although multiple sclerosis (MS) is frequent in the northern hemisphere, there have not been recent epidemiological studies in the Scottish Highlands about MS.

Objectives: To get updated data regarding MS prevalence, incidence and mortality in the Highlands. Time between symptom onset and MS diagnosis was also evaluated in incident MS cases and the pattern of use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) was analysed.

Methods: Study population was people with MS under the care of the Highland Health and Social Care Partnership. The catchment area included North area (Wick, Thurso, Brora, Invergordon), Center (Inverness, Aviemore, Nairn, Fort William), and West coast (Ullapool, Skye). Data were obtained from the MS database at Raigmore hospital (prevalence, midyear 2017) and the prospective hospital-register based study (diagnosis) that was carried out over a 12-month period, in 2016. The 2010 McDonald criteria for diagnosis of new MS cases were used. Crude prevalence and incidence and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the MS adult onset population, and data was standardised to the European standard population 2013; cause-specific mortality rate was analysed. Pattern of use of DMTs during the first year of diagnosis was also registered.

Results: 745 patients were registered in the MS database. 75.4% (562 cases) were females, and female/male ratio was 3:1. Mean age of population was 54.1 ± 14.1 years (range: 15-95 years). Mean number of years since diagnosis was 8.5 ± 4.6 years. Estimated prevalence for the population aged 15 and older was 376 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (95% CI: 354-399). 36 incident MS cases were registered in 2016 (88.8% females; mean age 40.4 ± 12.1 years). Annual incidence in Highlands was 18.2 per 100,000 inhabitants (95% CI: 14-24). The mean period of time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 38.8 ± 43.2 months. 47.2% (17/36) did not take any DMT during the first year after the diagnosis.

Conclusion: Prevalence and incidence of MS in the Scottish Highlands is high. Although the gap period between symptom onset and diagnosis is moderate, a significant proportion of recently diagnosed MS patients were not keen to start a DMT the first year after the diagnosis.

Crowdfunding: Are you a supporter of Prof G’s ‘Bed-to-5km Challenge’ in support of MS research?

CoI: multiple

Twitter: @gavinGiovannoni                                 Medium: @gavin_24211

For English PPMSers

“I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by” Douglas Adams, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

There is one deadline that happened quitely earlier this month. NHS England turned on the blueteq form ocrelizumab treatment for PPMSers living in England; they did at the last possible timepoint dictated by the law. The good news is that the requirements for someone with PPMS to be treated are relatively simple. All that is required from us is the following:

1. Confirmation the patient has a diagnosis of early PPMS with active disease, defined by the appearance of new lesions confirmed by two MRI studies taken at least 6 months apart OR one or more gadolinium enhancing lesions on one MRI over the last three years.

2. EDSS score <= 6.5

3. A decision agreed at an MS multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting.

4. Recording of all the above in the patient’s records (for audit purposes).

This has been a long time coming and I want to thank all my colleagues who signed-up to the open letter we sent to the Chief Medical Officer (see below). I suspect the letter may have helped find a funding solution. It is clear that when there is a will there is a way.

I am also beginning to realise that NHSE is actually on the side of the patient and contrary to my previous perceptions NHSE want patients to access effective treatments. The problem is they have limited budgets and are beholden to the Department of Health and the political system of the day.

We may have won one battle, but the war continues. PPMSers in Scotland still have no access to ocrelizumab. How can we live in a country, with a socialist healthcare system, that allows your place of abode to dictate your access to treatment? If there is anything we can do to help PPMSers living in Scotland please let us know.

Open Letter

Professor Dame Sally Davies
Chief Medical Officer
Department of Health
Room 114, Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London SW1A 2NS
Email:CMOweb@dh.gsi.gov.uk

24 September 2018

Dear Dame Sally

Ocrelizumab for the Treatment of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

We are writing to you as concerned healthcare professionals for help. We are neurologists, nurse specialists and allied healthcare professionals who specialise in multiple sclerosis (MS). Although patients with the relapsing-remitting type of MS have access to many disease-modifying treatments no treatments until now have been licensed for those with the primary progressive type of MS (PPMS). In its final appraisal document [FAD ID938] NICE has not recommended the first available licensed treatment ocrelizumab, for treating early PPMS.

The problem with NICE’s appraisal determination (FAD) is that the price for ocrelizumab had already been set for treating relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS, FAD TA533), but this price was considered not cost-effective for the treatment of PPMS based on its efficacy in the PPMS trial. As there are currently no licensed treatments for PPMS ocrelizumab had to be compared with best supportive care or no treatment. In comparison, when NICE appraised ocrelizumab for RRMS it was compared to all the other licensed disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

We have been told that Roche had then agreed to lower the price for ocrelizumab so that it would be cost-effective for the PPMS indication. If this was accepted it would mean ocrelizumab having two NHS prices, a higher price for the treatment of RRMS and a lower price for the treatment of PPMS. Apparently, the Department of Health is not prepared to support differential pricing, despite having a mechanism with the blueteq system for tracking prescribing for the PPMS and RRMS indications.

NICE’s decision in association with the Department of Health’s Rules means an irrational decision has been made. It also creates inequity. People with PPMS who are prepared to pay for ocrelizumab privately will be able to receive the therapy, potentially in an NHS institution. Similarly, those who are fortunate may be able to move and be treated with ocrelizumab in another country where ocrelizumab is covered for the PPMS indication as other UK and EU countries have different decision-making processes.

We would appreciate it if you could review the Department of Health’s position on differential pricing as a solution for people with PPMS being treated with ocrelizumab? We are convinced that there must be a solution that will allow our patients with PPMS to be appropriately treated under the NHS.

Despite the pharmaceutical company conceding to the NICE target and the drug receiving a European license, it is now the government who is preventing patients receiving appropriate treatment for their MS simply due to a rule, arguably an irrational rule, created by the Department of Health.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely

Concerned NHS HCPs.

CoI: multiple