#ClinicSpeak: anal and pelvic floor function in MS
Have you ever being incontinent in public? #ClinicSpeak #MSBlog
Patients with MS describe being incontinent of faeces and/or urine in public as being their worst nightmare. Do you agree?
I have managed several patients over the years that have become socially isolated as a result of this experience; they simply stay at home so as not to experience the embarrassment again. One patient of mine developed a severe anxiety disorder as a result of an episode of faecal incontinence in public. Her anxiety was so bad that she had to see a psychiatrist. She was eventually diagnosed as having a post-traumatic stress disorder. She had intrusive thoughts about the episode and kept having unpleasant flash-backs about the episode. In other words she was reliving the episode over and over again. It took her several years of counselling to overcome the social phobia associated with her anxiety and she eventually was able to start going out again. She now only goes out after having an enema to clear her lower colon and rectum, and she never eats when she is out so as not to stimulate her gastro-colic reflex. The latter is the reflex urge to defaecate that comes after eating a meal. She also wears pads and carries a change of clothing with her. She once showed me her faecal incontinence emergency pack; it contained wet wipes, clean underwear, spare continence pads and poo bags to dispose of any used items discreetly. Her emergency pack reminded me of what I used to carry around with me when I went out with my daughters before they were potty trained. With regard to her bowel function this particular patient has become a baby or child again.
The study below documents that in general pwMS with constipation have loss of sphincter tone (strength) at rest and during contraction compared to non-MS patients. In the subgroup of patients with faecal incontinence, rectal sensitivity threshold was lower in patients with MS than in other patients. In other words when faeces enters the rectum the threshold that triggers the defaecation reflex is lower. Finally, patients with MS had a decrease in the difference in resting anal pressure before and after maximum squeeze maneuvers, which suggests post-contraction sphincter spasticity. All this indicates impaired pelvic floor coordination in pwMS.
Knowing what is wrong with rectal and anal function in patients with bowel problems can help with specific therapies targeting specific symptoms, i.e. constipation, faecal hesitancy (difficult initiating a bowel action), incomplete emptying, faecal urgency, urgency incontinence, overflow diarrhoea, excessive bloating, excessive flatus, etc.
Bowel function is one of the hidden MS symptoms; patients often suffer in silence and their HCPs often fail to ask about bowel problems. Over the lifetime of the disease the majority of pwMS develop bowel problems so it is important for you to realise that a lot can be done to help you. If you have bowel problems can you please discuss these with your neurologist or MS clinical nurse specialist.
On the other side of the coin if MS is treated early and effectively before the neuronal pathways that control bowel function are damaged then these issues can hopefully be avoided or at least delayed.
Background: Constipation, obstructed defaecation, and faecal incontinence are frequent complaints in multiple sclerosis. The literature on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these disorders is scant.
Methods: Using anorectal manometry, we compared the anorectal function in patients with and without multiple sclerosis. 136 patients referred from our Center for Multiple Sclerosis to the Coloproctology Outpatient Clinic, between January 2005 and December 2011, were enrolled. The patients were divided into four groups: multiple sclerosis patients with constipation (group A); multiple sclerosis patients with faecal incontinence (group B); non-multiple sclerosis patients with constipation (group C); non-multiple sclerosis patients with faecal incontinence (group D). Anorectal manometry was performed to measure: resting anal pressure; maximum squeeze pressure; rectoanal inhibitory reflex; filling pressure and urge pressure. The difference between resting anal pressure before and after maximum squeeze maneuvers was defined as the change in resting anal pressure calculated for each patient.
Results: Group A patients were noted to have greater sphincter hypotonia (reduced tone) at rest and during contraction compared with those in group C (p=0.02); the rectal sensitivity threshold was lower in group B than in group D patients (p=0.02). No voluntary post-contraction sphincter relaxation was observed in either group A or group B patients (p=0.891 and p=0.939, respectively).
Conclusions: The decrease in the difference in resting anal pressure before and after maximum squeeze maneuvers suggests post-contraction sphincter spasticity, indicating impaired pelvic floor coordination in multiple sclerosis patients. A knowledge of manometric alterations in such patients may be clinically relevant in the selection of patients for appropriate treatments and for planning targeted rehabilitation therapy.