Atraumatic Needles: times are changing but we need to do more

Are you about to have a lumbar puncture? If yes, what needle is your neurology team going to use to perform the lumbar puncture? If you want a simple guide to LPs please visit our LP web app.





One of the biggest successes we have had at Barts-MS is the derisking of lumbar punctures. This was driven by our PROXIMUS trial and subsequently informed our clinical practice. LPs are also becoming more important as CSF analysis is now center-stage with the new rendition of the McDonald diagnostic criteria. The presence of oligoclonal immunoglobulin bands, or OCBs, in the spinal fluid now confirm dissemination in time. So if you are having a lumbar puncture for diagnostic, or monitoring, purposes please ask your neurologist to make sure they use an atraumatic or non-cutting needle. This reduces the risk of post-LP headaches by an order of magnitude and if you do get a headache they tend to be mild and self-limiting.


What do we mean by monitoring LP? We are increasingly doing LPs to assess spinal fluid neurofilament levels. Neurofilaments are released in response to axonal and neuronal damage. If you have a raised neurofilament levels it means there is ongoing damage and something should be done about it. Knowing your spinal fluid neurofilament levels helps decision making about treatment initiation and switching.  It adds more information about your MS and prognosis and simply helps us get a better picture of your disease. 


I am confident that within a year, or two, almost all MSologists will be using spinal fluid and possibly blood neurofilament levels as part of their clinical decision making. This has been a long time coming. I have been working on neurofilaments for over 20 years. Who said research translates quickly into clinical practice? 




ProfG    
.fa {
padding: 10px;
font-size: 20px;
width: 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
margin: 5px 2px;
border-radius: 50%;
}

.fa:hover {
opacity: 0.7;
}

.fa-facebook {
background: #3B5998;
color: white;
}

.fa-twitter {
background: #55ACEE;
color: white;
}

.fa-google {
background: #dd4b39;
color: white;
}

.fa-linkedin {
background: #007bb5;
color: white;
}

.fa-youtube {
background: #bb0000;
color: white;
}

.fa-instagram {
background: #125688;
color: white;
}

.fa-pinterest {
background: #cb2027;
color: white;
}

.fa-snapchat-ghost {
background: #fffc00;
color: white;
text-shadow: -1px 0 black, 0 1px black, 1px 0 black, 0 -1px black;
}

.fa-skype {
background: #00aff0;
color: white;
}

.fa-android {
background: #a4c639;
color: white;
}

.fa-dribbble {
background: #ea4c89;
color: white;
}

.fa-medium {
background: #000000;
color: white;
}

.fa-tumblr {
background: #2c4762;
color: white;
}

.fa-vine {
background: #00b489;
color: white;
}

.fa-foursquare {
background: #45bbff;
color: white;
}

.fa-stumbleupon {
background: #eb4924;
color: white;
}

.fa-flickr {
background: #f40083;
color: white;
}

.fa-yahoo {
background: #430297;
color: white;
}

.fa-soundcloud {
background: #ff5500;
color: white;
}

.fa-reddit {
background: #ff5700;
color: white;
}

.fa-rss {
background: #ff6600;
color: white;
}







BBC Radio: An Instinct for Kindness

One of our readers wants to make everyone aware of ‘An Instinct for Kindness‘, which was broadcast on BBC Radio 4.




….. This is a heartbreaking, but essential radio drama, about the bravery of suffering from MS and the true story of a woman who makes the decision to go to Dignitas in Switzerland to end her life. It is a tough listen, but you’ll be grateful you heard it. It is essential to hear this story for both sufferers and physicians working in MS…..



Can more be done to derisk natalizumab; the case for EID?

Extended-interval dosing (EID) breathes new life into natalizumab. Does this mean our #BrainAttack trial in CIS and an ASCEND II+ trial in SPMS (including wheelchair users) has a chance of getting done (wink-wink)?





I have several patients who despite being JCV+ve insist on staying on natalizumab despite alternative treatment options? In fact, I have some patients who after switching to another DMT have opted to go back onto natalizumab. The reason given for the latter decision relates to the return of MS fatigue, or brain fog, after switching from natalizumab. Natalizumab is quite remarkable in this regard and is the only DMT in which an n=1 trial is sufficient to know that the therapy works. Patients come back and literally say to you ‘I feel well, my fatigue has gone and my thinking is clear’. This is why anything that decreases the risk of PML for patients on natalizumab is a good thing.

At present we have JC virus testing (negative and positive), level of JCV antibodies (antibody index), a rising antibody index, previous exposure to immunosuppression, and treatment duration to help guide us with regard to the PML risk assessment. We also have frequent MRI monitoring (3-4 monthly) to detect PML early and plasma exchange to remove natalizumab as a backup option if one of our patients develops PML. This is why it is so exciting to hear that extended interval dosing (EID) may be another option at hand to reduce the risk of PML.



The theory behind EID is that some cells are less sensitive to the effects of natalizumab and that if you delay the next natalizumab infusion by 1 or 2 weeks the saturation of their surface receptors drops below a threshold and allows these cells to traffic into the central nervous system. If these less natalizumab-sensitive cells are the antiviral CD8+ T-cells and/or the natural-killer cells that fight viruses then this could allow immune surveillance of the CNS to occur that will prevent PML from occurring. If you get the EID right the saturation of the immune cells causing MS, possibly the memory B cells, is sufficient not to allow MS to reactivate. It is clear that not all cells are made equal when it comes to the effect of natalizumab. Importantly, there several other adhesion molecules on cells that impact on adhesion (stickiness) of immune cells to the blood vessels in the CNS. It could also be a delicate balance between the availability of different accessory adhesion molecules that makes the difference.

These principles have been adopted by some neurologists in the USA and the data that is emerging from their centres suggests they are correct, i.e. despite being JCV+ve pwMS on natalizumab on EID have a much lower risk of developing PML.

When Biogen, who market natalizumab, saw these results that decided to interrogate their big databases on the use of natalizumab in the USA. They are fortunate to have the so-called TOUCH programme that is a mandatory database of all pwMS on natalizumab in the USA. The TOUCH database allowed the statisticians to find people who are on EID and to compare them to standard interval dosing (SID) for PML risk. Because the TOUCH programme is real-life data and is not a clinical trial database the periods of EID are variable. To deal with this the statisticians defined three different types of EID with increasing stringency. The remarkable finding that EID was found to reduce the risk of PML compared to SID and in the most stringently defined cohort of EID there were no cases, i.e. zero cases, of PML. These data are so important to pwMS on natalizumab and the MS community that I have asked Lana Zhovtis Ryerson, the senior author of the poster and presentation at ACTRIMS to do a guest post on this very important topic. Good news she has accepted.



We at Barts-MS have acted on this already and have offered EID to a few of our patients at risk of PML on natalizumab. The question that needs to be answered is whether or not EID will be associated with some loss of efficacy of natalizumab. However, it may be possible to walk a tightrope and get the dosing just right to prevent MS and to keep the MS shredder at bay. We as an MS community will now have to do trials to find the sweet spot for EID. This may not be simple in that we may have to dose each patient differently to get the right level of VLA-4 saturation to treat MS, and intermittent VLA-4 desaturation to allow selective anti-viral cell trafficking to prevent PML. I predict that personalised dosing will come to pwMS on natalizumab; this will be based on body size and intermittent analysis of VLA-expression levels on cells to optimise the exact dose and duration between infusions.

I am personally thrilled by these results, Why? Anything that derisks PML for pwMS on natalizumab is a good thing and it increases the chances of us getting our natalizumab #BrainAttack trial off the ground (Biogen employees, I hope you are reading this post) and it also breathes new life into natalizumab possibly for people with more advanced MS. The latter is important because natalizumab is one of the DMTs that is effective in more advanced MS, particularly on slowing down or preventing worsening of hand and arm function. If Biogen were brave they would consider doing some of their EID saturation and mechanistic studies in SPMS as part of an ASCEND II+ trial; the + refers to extending the cohort into wheelchair users. If Roche is prepared to test ocrelizumab in PPMSers who are in wheelchairs, why wouldn’t you test natalizumab in SPMSers in wheelchairs? The unmet need in SPMS in terms of numbers is much larger than the PPMS population; the business case is a no-brainer (it writes itself).


Zhovtis Ryerson et al. Extended interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;87(8):885-9.


BACKGROUND: Natalizumab (NTZ), a monoclonal antibody to human α4β1/β7 integrin, is an effective therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS), albeit associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Clinicians have been extending the dose of infusions with a hypothesis of reducing PML risk. The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical consequences of reducing NTZ frequency of infusion up to 8 weeks 5 days.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review in 9 MS centres was performed in order to identify patients treated with extended interval dosing (EID) regimens of NTZ. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on EID NTZ treatment schedule in individual centres: early extended dosing (EED; n=249) every 4 weeks 3 days to 6 weeks 6 days; late extended dosing (LED; n=274) every 7 weeks to 8 weeks 5 days; variable extended dosing (n=382) alternating between EED and LED. These groups were compared with patients on standard interval dosing (SID; n=1093) every 4 weeks.

RESULTS: 17% of patients on SID had new T2 lesions compared with 14% in EID (p=0.02); 7% of patients had enhancing T1 lesions in SID compared with 9% in EID (p=0.08); annualised relapse rate was 0.14 in the SID group, and 0.09 in the EID group. No evidence of clinical or radiographic disease activity was observed in 62% of SID and 61% of EID patients (p=0.83). No cases of PML were observed in EID group compared with 4 cases in SID cohort.

CONCLUSIONS: Dosing intervals up to 8 weeks 5 days did not diminish effectiveness of NTZ therapy. Further monitoring is ongoing to evaluate if the risk of PML is reduced in patients on EID.

ProfG    
.fa {
padding: 10px;
font-size: 20px;
width: 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
margin: 5px 2px;
border-radius: 50%;
}

.fa:hover {
opacity: 0.7;
}

.fa-facebook {
background: #3B5998;
color: white;
}

.fa-twitter {
background: #55ACEE;
color: white;
}

.fa-google {
background: #dd4b39;
color: white;
}

.fa-linkedin {
background: #007bb5;
color: white;
}

.fa-youtube {
background: #bb0000;
color: white;
}

.fa-instagram {
background: #125688;
color: white;
}

.fa-pinterest {
background: #cb2027;
color: white;
}

.fa-snapchat-ghost {
background: #fffc00;
color: white;
text-shadow: -1px 0 black, 0 1px black, 1px 0 black, 0 -1px black;
}

.fa-skype {
background: #00aff0;
color: white;
}

.fa-android {
background: #a4c639;
color: white;
}

.fa-dribbble {
background: #ea4c89;
color: white;
}

.fa-medium {
background: #000000;
color: white;
}

.fa-tumblr {
background: #2c4762;
color: white;
}

.fa-vine {
background: #00b489;
color: white;
}

.fa-foursquare {
background: #45bbff;
color: white;
}

.fa-stumbleupon {
background: #eb4924;
color: white;
}

.fa-flickr {
background: #f40083;
color: white;
}

.fa-yahoo {
background: #430297;
color: white;
}

.fa-soundcloud {
background: #ff5500;
color: white;
}

.fa-reddit {
background: #ff5700;
color: white;
}

.fa-rss {
background: #ff6600;
color: white;
}








#ThinkHand: Today is MS Hand Awareness Day

We are hosting our #ThinkHand Awareness event tonight. The good news is that Shift.ms will be there to help promote the campaign. The following are some YouTube clips, from their reporters, explaining the campaign and how you can help. 

Thank you Shift.ms for helping and spreading hope for the million-plus people who have MS and are using a wheelchair.







What is the #ThinkHand campaign?


What treatments are available to improve upper limb function?


Why is it so important to maintain upper limb function?

How can MSers get involved in the #ThinkHand campaign?


The #ThinkHand 3-Billboards campaign?

Our Prime Minister has the decency to send her apologies

We are hosting our #ThinkHand awareness event tomorrow night. We were hoping to get Theresa May to attend and endorse the event. At least she responded. JK Rowling didn’t even acknowledge our invitation. Very poor form? 










What is the #ThinkHand Campaign?
#ThinkHand is simply an awareness campaign with the primary objective to get the wider MS community to focus their attention on hand function, particularly in people with more advanced MS. If you have MS and you lose the ability to walk, your hands and arms become your legs. Hand and arm function keeps you independent and allows you to maintain a reasonable quality of life. Recent clinical trials showing that disease modifying treatments, in people with more advanced MS, may delay worsening of their hand & arm function despite having very little, or no, impact on leg function.
The #ThinkHand campaign has achieved, or is trying to achieve, the following:

  1. To get the research community to study several hypotheses that underpin the science behind the preservation of hand function in MS and to design better trials for people with more advanced MS. 
  2. Design, test and validate an environmentally friendly cardboard 9-HPT to allows pwMS to self-monitor their arm & hand function. 
  3. To survey UK MSologist’s attitudes to the importance of hand function in MS. 
  4. To perform a clinical trial to study the effect of subcutaneous cladribine in MS wheelchair users (Chariot-MS Study). 
  5. To challenge the NHS England guidelines for stopping DMTs when people with MS develop secondary progressive MS and/or start using a wheelchair. 
  6. To get the pharmaceutical industry to do trials in more advanced MS focusing on hand & arm function as the primary outcome. 
  7. To validate the 9HPT as a primary outcome measure in clinical trials. 
  8. To develop a new personalised, or humanised, outcome measure to assess hand function in MS. 

Crowd-funding: Listeriosis Prevention Pack

We, Barts-MS, and the NHS needs your help to try and prevent Listeriosis after alemtuzumab treatment. We are raising money to produce a Listeriosis Prevention Pack. 


Barts-MS Listeria Prevention Pack Prototype


Barts MS Listeriosis Prevention Pack

We need to raise £7,000 which will be used to manufacture a large number of listeriosis prevention packs. The packs contain a food choice and hygiene manual, food stickers, fridge magnet, wallet card and thermometer. This pack, which has been designed by the Barts-MS advisory group, will engage both people with MS and healthcare professionals to take a pro-active approach to listeria prevention.

Why a listeria pack?

Currently, all we have is a single advice sheet with only basic information. We hope that we can fully prevent any unnecessary infections and enable patients, their family and friends to dramatically reduce the risk of infection.

The Barts MS team have developed the information in the pack with a cross-disciplinary team involving a listeriosis expert, people with MS, designers and healthcare professionals who will deliver it.

Why do we still need a pack? 


The reported incidence of Listeriosis post-alemtuzumab is reported as being 0.25%. In other words, 1 person in every 400 people treated with alemtuzumab gets Listeriosis. We are aware of at least one person who died as a result of this complication. 


What are we doing about it?


One solution is to provide prophylactic antibiotics. We use a drug called cotrimoxazole, a broad-spectrum antibiotic. The problem with this drug is that some people can’t  take it because they are allergic to the drug and others refuse because they are really worried about the effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics have on their microbiome. The microbiome refers to the trillions of bacteria that live in and on our bodies. 


An excellent, and currently best-selling, book ‘The Diet Myth: The Real Science Behind What We Eat‘, by Professor Tim Spector, details the impact of broad-spectrum antibiotics on our health. As a result of this book, I have had two patients turn down the option of Listeria antibiotic prophylaxis as part of our Alemtuzumab treatment protocol. One said: ‘No thank you; I don’t want my microbiome bazooka-ed’. I seem to recall this term being used in the book. We, therefore, have to also rely on diet to prevent Listeriosis a potentially life-threatening complication of alemtuzumab treatment. 



We have therefore designed a Barts MS Listeriosis Prevention Pack and now need £7,000 for a manufacturing run. These packs will be distributed to all patients prior to alemtuzumab treatment; please note these packs are not only for Barts Health patients; we plan to distribute them to other centres if they want them. 


If you would like to support this programme you can make a donation via our Barts Health crowdfunding site


Thank you.


ABN Guidance on preventing Listerial Infection



Some background reading


Evans & Redmond. Older Adult Consumer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Reported Storage Practices of Ready-to-Eat Food Products and Risks Associated with Listeriosis. J Food Prot. 2016 Feb;79(2):263-72. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-312.


Consumer implementation of recommended food safety practices, specifically relating to time and temperature control of ready-to-eat (RTE) food products associated with listeriosis are crucial. This is particularly the case for at-risk consumers such as older adults, given the increased listeriosis incidence reported internationally among adults aged ≥60 years. However, data detailing older adults’ cognitive risk factors associated with listeriosis are lacking. Combining data about knowledge, self-reported practices, and attitudes can achieve a cumulative multilayered in-depth understanding of consumer food safety behavior and cognition. This study aims to ascertain older adults’ cognition and behavior in relation to domestic food handling and storage practices that may increase the risks associated with L. monocytogenes. Older adults (≥60 years) (n = 100) participated in an interview and questionnaire to determine knowledge, self-reported practices, and attitudes toward recommended practices. Although the majority (79%) had positive attitudes toward refrigeration, 84% were unaware of recommended temperatures (5°C) and 65% self-reported “never” checking their refrigerator temperature. Although most (72%) knew that “use-by” dates indicate food safety and 62% reported “always” taking note, neutral attitudes were held, with 67% believing it was safe to eat food beyond use-by dates and 57% reporting doing so. Attitudes toward consuming foods within the recommended 2 days of opening were neutral, with 55% aware of recommendations and , 84% reporting that they consume RTE foods beyond recommendations. Although knowledgeable of some key practices, older adults self-reported potentially unsafe practices when storing RTE foods at home, which may increase risks associated with L. monocytogenes. This study has determined that older adults’ food safety cognition may affect their behaviors; understanding consumer food safety cognition is essential for developing targeted food safety education.

My trip to Lucerne and the Charcot Project

A few weeks ago I was invited to give a lecture at the annual Swiss MS Society meeting on ‘The Charcot Project’ and the rationale behind using anti-viral drugs to treat MS.



As promised my slides from the meeting; they should be self-explanatory:




The Charcot Project is an initiative that Professor Gold and I launched about 5 years ago to tackle MS from a different perspective; a perspective that MS is caused by a virus and to tackle MS we need to start doing treatment trials using anti-virals. The two leading viral contenders are EBV and HERVs.  If you have any queries about the slides please feel free to ask. 


In this presentation, I stress the point that I have made several times before that MRI activity (new Gd-enhancing lesions) and relapses are not MS, the disease. If they were the disease they would predict MS outcomes whether or not you are on a DMT. The data indicates they only predict outcomes when you are on a DMT. Based on Prentice criteria of what constitutes a surrogate end-point for a disease both relapses and MRI activity fail. 


I then review the observation that changes occur weeks to months in the white matter before a new focal lesion occurs. This would indicate something is happening in the brain of pwMS prior to inflammation (‘Field Hypothesis’). This may explain the Prineas lesion, i.e. oligodendrocyte apoptosis without overt inflammation. The million dollar question is what is killing the oligodendrocyte? 


I then review the epidemiology evidence supporting EBV and possibly HERVs as the viral aetiology of MS. I complete the lecture with some experiments that need to be done to prove that EBV is the cause of MS. Simple? I wish! Trying to get funding for studying the viral cause of MS is very difficult and slow, but we will get there, eventually. 

ProfG    
.fa {
padding: 10px;
font-size: 20px;
width: 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
margin: 5px 2px;
border-radius: 50%;
}

.fa:hover {
opacity: 0.7;
}

.fa-facebook {
background: #3B5998;
color: white;
}

.fa-twitter {
background: #55ACEE;
color: white;
}

.fa-google {
background: #dd4b39;
color: white;
}

.fa-linkedin {
background: #007bb5;
color: white;
}

.fa-youtube {
background: #bb0000;
color: white;
}

.fa-instagram {
background: #125688;
color: white;
}

.fa-pinterest {
background: #cb2027;
color: white;
}

.fa-snapchat-ghost {
background: #fffc00;
color: white;
text-shadow: -1px 0 black, 0 1px black, 1px 0 black, 0 -1px black;
}

.fa-skype {
background: #00aff0;
color: white;
}

.fa-android {
background: #a4c639;
color: white;
}

.fa-dribbble {
background: #ea4c89;
color: white;
}

.fa-medium {
background: #000000;
color: white;
}

.fa-tumblr {
background: #2c4762;
color: white;
}

.fa-vine {
background: #00b489;
color: white;
}

.fa-foursquare {
background: #45bbff;
color: white;
}

.fa-stumbleupon {
background: #eb4924;
color: white;
}

.fa-flickr {
background: #f40083;
color: white;
}

.fa-yahoo {
background: #430297;
color: white;
}

.fa-soundcloud {
background: #ff5500;
color: white;
}

.fa-reddit {
background: #ff5700;
color: white;
}

.fa-rss {
background: #ff6600;
color: white;
}







What is your risk of developing PML on fingolimod?

The following update on PML risk on fingolimod was released to us by Novartis. 



Will this new data lead to a change in practice? 


PML under fingolimod therapy not attributed to previous natalizumab treatment is very rare and the risk is estimated to be less than 1:10,000 patients.

19 confirmed PML cases in >225,000 fingolimod-treated patients (>508,000 patient-years) as of the 30th of November 2017.

The estimated risk (95% CI) is 0.084 (0.051; 0.131)/1,000 patients and the incidence rate (95% CI) is 3.74 (2.25; 5.84)/100,000 patient-years exposure.)

  • Two cases had confounding medical conditions (1 previous cancer and 1 ulcerative colitis/immunosuppressive therapy).
  • One patient had previous NTZ exposure for 10 months (3 years and 9 months before PML diagnosis).
  • In one patient, PML occurred during 3 months of NTZ exposure, after 4.5 years of fingolimod treatment; this patient also had a history of recent exposure to steroids.
  • Demographics: age range from 34 to 71 years, with a female preponderance (14 of 19 cases) and a diverse geographic distribution.
  • Fingolimod exposure ranged from 18 to 84 months. 18 of the 19 patients had fingolimod ranging between 29 and 84 months while one had received fingolimod for 18 months.
  • There was no pattern of sustained grade 4 lymphopenia (defined as absolute lymphocyte count ≤200 cells/µL and based on the reported absolute lymphocyte count values in 15 of 19 cases).
  • JCV DNA PCR test was positive in all cases.


In the past, there has been no clear correlation between opportunistic infection risk and lymphocyte counts on fingolimod. As a result of this, the FDA did not mandate the monitoring of lymphocyte counts in pwMS on fingolimod in routine clinical practice. In comparison, the EMA implemented the same requirements that were part of the fingolimod trial programme; i.e. dose interruption was done if the total, or absolute, lymphocyte count dropped below 200. The latter is quite common in people with MS on fingolimod. To reconcile the differences between the FDA and EMA we suggested a half-way house mark and to only interrupt fingolimod dosing if the counts dropped below 100. 

Only the minority of PML cases (~20%) on fingolimod had counts below 200. Does this mean we now have to change this recommendation? I think it would seem reasonable to go back to the 200 cut-off as recommended by the EMA. 

Does this mean that the FDA will now have to change their recommendations? I am sure they will. The FDA is a data-driven organization and are likely to respond to this new information. 

Unfortunately, fingolimod does not move from the list of DMTs that can’t be derisked regarding immunosuppression and opportunistic infections, to the list of DMTs that can potentially be de-risked. The majority of opportunistic infections still occur in pwMS with lymphocyte counts above 200. 

NOTE: If you are on fingolimod and your lymphocyte count is below 200 please speak to your neurologist or clinical nurse specialist. If you don’t know your lymphocyte count you should find out. As we can’t derisk fingolimod you must be please remain vigilant of any new symptoms, this includes neurological and systemic symptoms, that could suggest an opportunistic infection. 

ProfG    
.fa {
padding: 10px;
font-size: 20px;
width: 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
margin: 5px 2px;
border-radius: 50%;
}

.fa:hover {
opacity: 0.7;
}

.fa-facebook {
background: #3B5998;
color: white;
}

.fa-twitter {
background: #55ACEE;
color: white;
}

.fa-google {
background: #dd4b39;
color: white;
}

.fa-linkedin {
background: #007bb5;
color: white;
}

.fa-youtube {
background: #bb0000;
color: white;
}

.fa-instagram {
background: #125688;
color: white;
}

.fa-pinterest {
background: #cb2027;
color: white;
}

.fa-snapchat-ghost {
background: #fffc00;
color: white;
text-shadow: -1px 0 black, 0 1px black, 1px 0 black, 0 -1px black;
}

.fa-skype {
background: #00aff0;
color: white;
}

.fa-android {
background: #a4c639;
color: white;
}

.fa-dribbble {
background: #ea4c89;
color: white;
}

.fa-medium {
background: #000000;
color: white;
}

.fa-tumblr {
background: #2c4762;
color: white;
}

.fa-vine {
background: #00b489;
color: white;
}

.fa-foursquare {
background: #45bbff;
color: white;
}

.fa-stumbleupon {
background: #eb4924;
color: white;
}

.fa-flickr {
background: #f40083;
color: white;
}

.fa-yahoo {
background: #430297;
color: white;
}

.fa-soundcloud {
background: #ff5500;
color: white;
}

.fa-reddit {
background: #ff5700;
color: white;
}

.fa-rss {
background: #ff6600;
color: white;
}